Connect with us

Tech

The Rundown: The hope, hype and reality of data clean rooms

Published

on

The Rundown: The hope, hype and reality of data clean rooms

Given ongoing data privacy concerns, it may feel like everyone in advertising believes in using a data clean room these days. But, in actuality, they’re not that popular.

In fact, more than half (53%) of the 266 marketing professionals surveyed by data clean room firm Habu said they have never used one.

In short, data clean rooms are a long way off mass adoption despite how ubiquitous they seem to be in the marketing lexicon now — a point that should surprise no one. Most marketers wouldn’t know what to do with a data clean room if they had one.

“From a clean room perspective, two things we know to be true are that privacy and decentralization of the data that fuels our industry are not going away any time soon,” said Tim Norris-Wiles, managing director of international at Habu. “That being said, most of digital advertising lacks clarity right now, as opposed to any one individual technology or subcategory. There’s a lot up in the air, making it challenging for brands to know where to invest their time, money and strategy for fear of the goalposts moving.”

So marketers are really no better off now than they were before clean rooms came around?

Yeah, the whole situation feels a bit like an oxymoron. Data clean rooms were meant to bring some clarity to what was becoming a very opaque way of targeting and measuring ads in place of blunt third-party addressability, and yet providing clarity is the last thing these technologies have done. The market is awash with solutions preaching different takes on the same goal: scaling the use of identity in a privacy-compliant way. Sorting the wheat from the chaff here is a business planning and technical challenge. That would be hard enough without the fact that each advertiser, publisher and software provider defines identity and audiences slightly differently. And that’s just for the marketers that have determined how to build addressable audiences beyond the rudimentary. There are many others, however, who are not even remotely ready to be given the keys to this sort of technology. 

“The reality is most marketers, if we’re being honest, have never actually had to define these audiences on their own, much less track performance etc. across a media lifecycle,” said Kevin Bauer, data and identity strategy lead at Prohaska Consulting. “Historically they just did whatever the walled garden (i.e Facebook etc.) told them to do, without really taking the time to understand it deeply.”

In many ways, the real issue is how marketers own those data clean room relationships as opposed to being the silent partner

Up until now, marketers haven’t had to really think about data clean rooms. They’ve had to use them, of course. Anyone who has spent money on Facebook, Amazon or Google over the years will have done so. But in those instances, those companies have wielded all the control over what happened in those environments. Marketers had to just go with the flow. These days, they can’t be so passive. They have to own at least half of those relationships. Granted, that’s not necessarily with the platforms. It’s more with the scores of third-party solutions that have emerged over the years. Nevertheless, this is a sea-change in how to plan, forecast, evaluate and operationalize decision making, said Bauer. Look at the changes Walgreens-owned retail pharmacy chain Boots had to go through to use a data clean room for proof. Its marketing team was brought a lot closer to its data team as a result.

“The clarity of a clean room solution is directly proportional to the clarity and maturity of building addressable audiences beyond ‘all humans’ or ‘People who eat cheese’,” continued Bauer. “Until brands gain maturity in determining their own data and identity taxonomy, it will be harder to understand how to leverage third-party software solutions in concert with other business partners to make use of these identities.”

This sounds like a slog. What steps does it take to get to a point where you realistically argue the case for a data clean room?

For starters, a marketer needs a clear identity taxonomy for their organization that helps them sort and make sense of various device, account, or household level data sets into something that can be leveraged as a data product across systems and processes. While some companies will have had to have done this as a matter of course — think those in banking, telcos and energy — there are others that won’t know where to start; their media investment and operational decisions are made on a channel and or at partner level as the common denominator, not on individuals or audiences. Not to mention the small matter of the eye-watering costs of these technologies. To say nothing of the need to audit data clean room services across their existing tech stack before making any big investments in a new solution.

There are a lot of solutions now in the market for advertisers, all with nuances and individual characteristics from functionality to integrations into walled gardens. Which is to say finding the right solution is a long process. Even the first step of listing and prioritizing the benefits a solution can enable for marketers takes time as the space is developing so fast and every month there is seemingly new capability being released or major issues fixed, said Dan Larden, head of U.K. at digital media consultancy TPA. “On top of that, as it’s first-party data, navigating multiple stakeholders in legal, technology and IT that need to lean into any process adds more complexity,” he continued.

Are data clean rooms worth all this hassle? 

It depends on who you ask. For some marketers, data clean rooms are invaluable — or at least they think they will be soon. To them, there are few better ways to futureproof an advertising strategy. That’s because the use cases go beyond just showing people an ad in ways that don’t attract the ire of privacy regulators. Then there are those marketers who aren’t so quick on the take up. And who can blame them? It’s so hard to know whether they have a challenge that only a clean room can solve. And even if they do, finding the right data clean room solution isn’t easy. No surprise that so many marketers feel the juice isn’t worth the squeeze.

“It’s a slow process because aside from a genuine use case for a data clean room, advertisers need to remember that they have to enter into an agreement with another data owner, which is often a long, protracted process,” said Charlie Hawker, global data director at Wavemaker. “Some of these big brands have a long procurement process. A data clean room isn’t something that gets typically signed via an agency. That’s normally done via the client.”

Will data clean rooms ever take off? 

Chances are they will. It may take a while, though. There are many marketers who are still figuring out how to wrangle their data, for a start. This will change and when it does more marketers are likely to take these solutions more seriously. As Vihan Sharma, md of Europe at ad tech vendor LiveRamp explained: “This perception of data clean rooms being cumbersome means there has been reluctance by some to get involved, but this is an outdated misconception.”

The real issue is that — at least for now — the technologies deliver small but not necessarily scalable benefits. Indeed, use cases are either scant or quite niche. That’s despite the technologies being capable of so much more, from delivering analytics and insights to marketing attribution and improving machine learning. Data clean rooms are a lot more than putting ads on a site. That should stand them in good stead as more marketers come to terms with the potential (or lack thereof) of their own data.

“That said, data clean rooms are only one part of the data infrastructure needed to support retail media,” said Sharma. ”As a result, it’s important that they are tightly integrated into business user-accessible capabilities including, insight and planning tools, data management, as well as activation and measurement, rather than pure-play data clean rooms that are more focused on data science and analytical use cases.”

Read More

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Tech

FIFA 23 lets you turn off commentary pointing out how bad you are

Published

on

By

FIFA 23 lets you turn off commentary pointing out how bad you are
A player shouldering the ball



(Image credit: EA)

FIFA 23 might be the best game soccer game yet for terrible sports fans, as it lets you turn off commentary that criticizes your bad playing.

Now that the early access FIFA 23 release time has passed, EA Play and Xbox Game Pass Ultimate subscribers can hop into the game ahead of its full release. But as Eurogamer (opens in new tab) spotted, they’ll find a peculiar option waiting for them.

FIFA 23 includes a toggle to turn off ‘Critical Commentary’. The setting lets you silence all negative in-match comments made about your technique, so you can protect your precious ego even when you miss an open goal or commit an obvious foul. The more positive commentary won’t be affected. 

Spare your feelings

A player dribbling the ball in FIFA 23

(Image credit: EA)

The feature looks tailored toward children and new players, who don’t want to have their confidence wrecked within mere minutes of picking up the controller. But even experienced players who just so happen to be terrible at the game might benefit.

It’s not perfect, though. According to Eurogamer, the feature didn’t seem to work during a FIFA Ultimate Team Division Rivals match, with critical comments slipping through the filter. Still, who hasn’t benefited from a light grilling every now and then?

Polite commentary isn’t the only new addition in FIFA 23. It’s the first game in the series to include women’s club football teams, and fancy overhauled animations that take advantage of the PS5 and Xbox Series X|S’s new-gen hardware. EA will be hoping to end on a high, as FIFA 23 will be the last of its soccer games to release with the official FIFA licence.

If disabling critical commentary doesn’t improve your soccer skills, maybe building a squad of Marvel superheroes will. Although you might not do much better with Ted Lasso wandering the pitch.

FIFA 23 is set to fully release this Friday, September 30.

Callum is TechRadar Gaming’s News Writer. You’ll find him whipping up stories about all the latest happenings in the gaming world, as well as penning the odd feature and review. Before coming to TechRadar, he wrote freelance for various sites, including Clash, The Telegraph, and Gamesindustry.biz, and worked as a Staff Writer at Wargamer. Strategy games and RPGs are his bread and butter, but he’ll eat anything that spins a captivating narrative. He also loves tabletop games, and will happily chew your ear off about TTRPGs and board games. 

Read More

Continue Reading

Tech

Google Pixel 7 price leak suggests Google is totally out of touch

Published

on

By

Google Pixel 7 price leak suggests Google is totally out of touch
The backs of the Pixel 7 and the Pixel 7 Pro



(Image credit: Google)

We’re starting to hear more and more Google Pixel 7 leaks, with the launch of the phone just a week away, but tech fans might be getting a lot of déjà vu, with the leaks all listing near-identical specs to what we heard about the Pixel 6 a year ago.

It sounds like the new phones – a successor to the Pixel 6 Pro is also expected – could be very similar to their 2021 predecessors. And a new price leak has suggested that the phones’ costs could be the same too, as a Twitter user spotted the Pixel 7 briefly listed on Amazon (before being promptly taken down, of course).

Google pixel 7 on Amazon US. $599.99.It is still showing up in search cache but the listing gives an error if you click on it. We have the B0 number to keep track of though!#teampixel pic.twitter.com/w5Z09D28YESeptember 27, 2022

See more

According to these listings, the Pixel 7 will cost $599 while the Pixel 7 Pro will cost $899, both of which are identical to the Pixel 6 and Pixel 6 Pro starting prices. The leak doesn’t include any other region prices, but in the UK the current models cost £599 and £849, while in Australia they went for AU$999 and AU$1,299.

So it sounds like Google is planning on retaining the same prices for its new phones as it sold the old ones for, a move which doesn’t make much sense.


Analysis: same price, new world

Google’s choice to keep the same price points is a little curious when you consider that the specs leaks suggest these phones are virtually unchanged from their predecessors. You’re buying year-old tech for the same price as before.

Do bear in mind that the price of tech generally lowers over time, so you can readily pick up a cheaper Pixel 6 or 6 Pro right now, and after the launch of the new ones, the older models will very likely get even cheaper.

But there’s another key factor to consider in the price: $599 might be the same number in 2022 as it was in 2021, but with the changing global climate, like wars and flailing currencies and cost of living crises, it’s a very different amount of money.

Some people just won’t be willing to shell out the amount this year, that they may have been able to last year. But this speaks to a wider issue in consumer tech.

Google isn’t the only tech company to completely neglect the challenging global climate when pricing its gadgets: Samsung is still releasing super-pricey folding phones, and the iPhone 14 is, for some incomprehensible reason, even pricier than the iPhone 13 in some regions. 

Too few brands are actually catering to the tough economic times many are facing right now, with companies increasing the price of their premium offerings to counter rising costs, instead of just designing more affordable alternatives to flagships.

These high and rising prices suggest that companies are totally out of touch with their buyers, and don’t understand the economic hardship troubling many.

We’ll have to reach a breaking point sooner or later, either with brands finally clueing into the fact that they need to release cheaper phones, or with customers voting with their wallets by sticking to second-hand or refurbished devices. But until then, you can buy the best cheap phones to show that cost is important to you.

Tom’s role in the TechRadar team is to specialize in phones and tablets, but he also takes on other tech like electric scooters, smartwatches, fitness, mobile gaming and more. He is based in London, UK.

He graduated in American Literature and Creative Writing from the University of East Anglia. Prior to working in TechRadar freelanced in tech, gaming and entertainment, and also spent many years working as a mixologist. Outside of TechRadar he works in film as a screenwriter, director and producer.

Read More

Continue Reading

Tech

DisplayMate awards the “Best Smartphone Display” title to the iPhone 14 Pro Max

Published

on

By

DisplayMate awards the “Best Smartphone Display” title to the iPhone 14 Pro Max

, , , , , ,

search relation.

, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

 

Read More

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2022 Xanatan